Creating safer spaces and bravespaces

In feminist movements, safer spaces – shelters – play (and have played) an important role as temporary sanctuaries for interaction that is as free from oppressive patriarchal power structures as possible, for sharing experiences, for creating bonds and showing solidarity and for mutual empowering.

Spaces of teaching and learning at the university cannot be conceived or contextualized without societal power structures. Different dimensions of diversity (such as gender, race, class, ethnicity, and many more) exert decisive influence on one’s socialization. In order to create inclusive spaces characterized by gender-sensitivity and diversity-awareness, it is therefore vital to identify the effects personal values, norms and expectations have on everyday actions and practices (of teaching) and to self-critically reflect upon the dynamics of internal- as well as external perception. Doing so is both a necessity as well as a prerequisite for becoming agents of change, for respectfully and responsibly approaching and interrelating with others. (um)

What can safer spaces of teaching and learning provide?

The aim is to protect from disparaging, exclusionary and discriminatory behavior which may become visible in objectionable comments or innuendo, unfair judgement, offensive language or condescending looks. At the same time, it is about the creation of spaces of possibility, about being able to enter into constructive and critical dialogue, about having the capacity to tolerate differences and disagreements – and about being brave, addressing and discussing topics that may lie outside the comfort zone, learning to manage conflicts, making mistakes (Fehlerfreundlich agieren), and to intervene when transgressions and/or psychologically harmful behavior occur in class. The webtool Tricky Moments shows versatile strategies and possibilities for responsibly meeting discriminatory and/or offensive acts. Thereby enabling the raising of awareness, becoming safer and braver and defending oneself (and others) against discrimination. Experience shows that persons affected by sexism, racism, classism, ableism (and other forms of discrimination) will participate in brave discussions with disproportionately greater caution. For concrete practices of safer spaces to be successful, it is therefore required to be aware of this unequal footing. (um)

How can this be achieved?

  • The building of trust represents an essential aspect for the realization of both open as well as critical dialogue and interaction. Here, trust means trusting in oneself and in one’s colleagues and their capacities to choose words consciously (Employing gender and diversity inclusive language and images), their ability to be mindful and their readiness to listen attentively; it also means trusting in shared knowledge concerning the unequal distribution of privileges in society and trusting in the fact that not everyone finds themselves in the same starting position equipped with equal starting capabilities from the very beginning and that access to resources (in relation to education, professional position, etc.) differs substantially. Individual experiences related during class are therefore always also a product of societal influences and need to be understood as being embedded in socially constructed inequalities.
  • In turn, this trust is firmly connected to yet another aspect relevant for success: a collective sense of responsibility – i.e. trusting in the fact that – should violations, transgressions or any discriminating behavior occur – there exists a willingness to assume responsibility by talking about it, intervening in it and thinking about how to deal with it (accountable spaces).
  • A first manageable step towards safer and brave spaces in the context of gender-sensitive and diversity-aware teaching would be to communicate respective requirements and expectations connected to the teaching and learning space in the first scheduled meeting of a class. (Depending on the time available) Students are then invited to contribute their ideas in relation to group norms and how to shape a safer and brave space. (um)

Literature

for further reading and for delving deeper

Brian ARAO, Kristi CLEMENS (2013)
From Safe Spaces to Brave Spaces. A New Way to Frame Dialogue Around Diversity and Social Justice. In: Lisa M. Landreman (Hg.): The Art of Effective Facilitation. Refelctions From Social Justice Educators. Sterlin, Virginia, 135–150

bell hooks (2010)
Teaching Critical Thinking. Practical Wisdom. Routledge, New York.

Maya Joleen KOKITS, Mariaon THUSWALD (2015)
gleich sicher? sicher gleich? Konzeptionen (queer) feministischer Schutzräume. In: Femina Politica – Zeitschrift für feministische Politikwissenschaft, 24(1), 83–93

Hannah Sophie LINDMAIER (2021)
Balancieren zwischen Nähe und Distanz: Drei Perspektiven auf machtsensibles Verhalten im Instrumentalunterricht, in: Üben & Musizieren 1/21, 21–24

Azadê PEŞMEN (2016)
Wishful thinking: Safe spaces. Ist das noch Utopie oder schon Illusion?, in: Missy Magazine